top of page

Fortes, Lopes, Siebner Criminal Law Office

The office

Excellence and personalized service.

Discretion and professional thoroughness.

Since 2020.

Imagem2_edited_edited.png

Areas of expertise

The firm provides legal advice to its clients in different spheres of activity, both judicially and out-of-court.

In court, in addition to monitoring its clients' cases on a daily basis, the firm has a strong presence in the country's Superior Courts (Superior Court of Justice and Federal Supreme Court).

In out-of-court, the firm provides legal advice and works in the preliminary stages of investigation.

Moreover, it should be noted that the firm represents the interest of its clients in the most varied areas and spheres of Criminal Law.

Criminal law

The Fortes, Lopes, Siebner Advogados works in all stages of the criminal process, from the preliminary stages of the investigation, such as the drawing up of a police report and the monitoring of a police investigation, to representation in court, before ordinary and higher instances.

In addition, it has extensive experience in criminal enforcement.

Economic Criminal Law

The office has a team of expert lawyers, with experience in advising executives of small and large companies throughout the country on issues related to economic, financial, tax, administrative and bidding crimes, as well as asset fraud, money laundering and consumer relations.

Victim Support

Another extremely important activity performed by the office is the support and provision of legal assistance to victims - representation at police stations to issue an occurrence report, follow-up on a police investigation, filing of a criminal complaint, and representation in court as an accusation assistant.

Partners

Articles, Interviews and News

October 23, 2025

Legal Consultant ("Conjur") | "In an appeal to the Superior Court of Justice, the defense argued that the judge acted as a "true inquisitor" during the evidentiary hearing. The judge presented witnesses with a photo of four female suspects, in which the accused's face was already highlighted. (...)

Justice Otávio de Almeida Toledo, the reporting judge on the case, sided with the defense's argument. He considered that there had been "blatant and prejudicial misdirection" of the photographic identification, "in stark contrast to the underlying accusatory system."

“The photographic recognition carried out in court, with the magistrate's overflowing (and not supplementary) protagonism — by pointing out to the witnesses and/or victims questioned, in a preliminary, incisive, circled (with individualized manipulation) manner in the photo and devoid of objective impartiality, the accused party as one of the 'possible' perpetrators of the reported crime, with the similar (equivalent) adoption of the spurious methodology called ' show-up' — gives rise, in accordance with articles 212 and 226, both of the CPP, to the mandatory annulment of the investigative act,” he wrote."

IMG_5065-min-1170x738.jpg

Contact

Avenida Marquês de São Vicente, 230, cjs. 601/602, Várzea da Barra Funda, São Paulo/SP, 01139-000

(11) 3392-2253

  • LinkedIn
  • LinkedIn

©2021 by Fortes, Lopes, Siebner Advogados.

bottom of page